Please help me pick the best Ad

Posted on 20. Jul, 2012 by in Blog

Below are two versions of  a half page magazine ad that I want to run.  As customers and prospects – you are the audience that I want to

- see the ad – read the ad – and go to SkyMall to purchase (or search out the Country Club Elite Mat™ or  www.Realfeelgolfmats.com )

Please help me pick the winner in the comments below:

Version#1 – please cast your vote in the comments below

 

Version#2 – please cast your vote in the comments below

 

Please post your comments below.

Thank you for your help!

please use Bonus Code – BB12Free at checkout with your next order for 12 free birdieballs

go here and order now:  http://www.realfeelgolfmats.com/golf-accessories/

 

 

45 Responses to “Please help me pick the best Ad”

  1. John

    21. Jul, 2012

    Both seem a tad busy, but version #2 looks better to me. Good luck with this. I have had my mat for five years and
    it is still in great shape.

    Reply to this comment
    • Jay

      21. Jul, 2012

      thanks John, I was thinking 5-10 year expected life may soud unbelievable – but it’s true! I’m still using the original CCE prototype I made in 2006.
      thx for your help , jay

  2. John

    21. Jul, 2012

    Both seem a tad busy, but version #2 looks better to me. Good luck with this. I have had my mat for five years and
    it is still in great shape.

    Reply to this comment
    • Jay

      21. Jul, 2012

      thanks John, I was thinking 5-10 year expected life may soud unbelievable – but it’s true! I’m still using the original CCE prototype I made in 2006.
      thx for your help , jay

  3. Victor

    21. Jul, 2012

    Version 2

    Reply to this comment
  4. Victor

    21. Jul, 2012

    Version 2

    Reply to this comment
  5. Greg

    21. Jul, 2012

    version 2 is my choice

    Reply to this comment
  6. Greg

    21. Jul, 2012

    version 2 is my choice

    Reply to this comment
  7. Dana Horton

    22. Jul, 2012

    Version 2 has a more lasting impression.

    Reply to this comment
  8. Dana Horton

    22. Jul, 2012

    Version 2 has a more lasting impression.

    Reply to this comment
  9. Belinda

    22. Jul, 2012

    Version 2

    Reply to this comment
  10. Belinda

    22. Jul, 2012

    Version 2

    Reply to this comment
  11. Brian Boyle

    22. Jul, 2012

    hey Jay,

    BB from NOLA but originally from Philly up in your neck of the woods. I agree with most-#2- and also agree that for a few sheckles you can have a graphic designer lend their expertise to your intended message/audience. I also agree with Thomas on the Bender point but would add the pic of the young girl in #1 because as you know I purchased your product to use with the net in my garage/backyard and it hooked my 12 year old daughter on the great game of golf.

    Kepp doing what you’re doing my friend!

    Reply to this comment
  12. Brian Boyle

    22. Jul, 2012

    hey Jay,

    BB from NOLA but originally from Philly up in your neck of the woods. I agree with most-#2- and also agree that for a few sheckles you can have a graphic designer lend their expertise to your intended message/audience. I also agree with Thomas on the Bender point but would add the pic of the young girl in #1 because as you know I purchased your product to use with the net in my garage/backyard and it hooked my 12 year old daughter on the great game of golf.

    Kepp doing what you’re doing my friend!

    Reply to this comment
  13. Trevor

    22. Jul, 2012

    I like the simplified clarity of Version 2.

    Reply to this comment
  14. Trevor

    22. Jul, 2012

    I like the simplified clarity of Version 2.

    Reply to this comment
  15. andy corry

    23. Jul, 2012

    version 2 – it’s easier to read

    Reply to this comment
  16. andy corry

    23. Jul, 2012

    version 2 – it’s easier to read

    Reply to this comment
  17. tom rosdick

    23. Jul, 2012

    I like #2.

    Reply to this comment
  18. tom rosdick

    23. Jul, 2012

    I like #2.

    Reply to this comment
  19. Tom

    23. Jul, 2012

    I was going to say #1, but having read the comments I have to agree that 2 is much cleaner and not as busy. Maybe only include one testimonial and then list a few other “known” names of recommended by type users to cut down a bit more – I’m not a graphic designer but I did go to Smuggs, VT this year :-)

    Reply to this comment
  20. Tom

    23. Jul, 2012

    I was going to say #1, but having read the comments I have to agree that 2 is much cleaner and not as busy. Maybe only include one testimonial and then list a few other “known” names of recommended by type users to cut down a bit more – I’m not a graphic designer but I did go to Smuggs, VT this year :-)

    Reply to this comment
  21. Danny Ellis

    23. Jul, 2012

    I fly quite a bit and always thumb through the Sky Mall catalogue. #2 would definitely be more likely to catch my eye because it is a bit less busy.

    Reply to this comment
  22. Danny Ellis

    23. Jul, 2012

    I fly quite a bit and always thumb through the Sky Mall catalogue. #2 would definitely be more likely to catch my eye because it is a bit less busy.

    Reply to this comment
  23. Gary

    23. Jul, 2012

    I vote for #2. It’s cleaner and easier to look at. I’ll receive my golf mat in a couple of days.

    Reply to this comment
  24. Gary

    23. Jul, 2012

    I vote for #2. It’s cleaner and easier to look at. I’ll receive my golf mat in a couple of days.

    Reply to this comment
  25. Richard Klein

    23. Jul, 2012

    #2 for all the reasons stated; but you knew that!

    Reply to this comment
  26. Richard Klein

    23. Jul, 2012

    #2 for all the reasons stated; but you knew that!

    Reply to this comment
  27. Michael

    23. Jul, 2012

    I like version # 2 better, it highlights the more important factors that come into play when considering a quality golf matt. No bounce, easier on wrist and elbows, no bounce, can take a divot and it’s durable. The Bold statement “True Divot Action” stood out the most in add # 2 and I feel that is what everyone is looking for that is in search of a matt that can duplicate the same action as real turf.

    Reply to this comment
  28. Michael

    23. Jul, 2012

    I like version # 2 better, it highlights the more important factors that come into play when considering a quality golf matt. No bounce, easier on wrist and elbows, no bounce, can take a divot and it’s durable. The Bold statement “True Divot Action” stood out the most in add # 2 and I feel that is what everyone is looking for that is in search of a matt that can duplicate the same action as real turf.

    Reply to this comment
  29. Bill Bigler

    24. Jul, 2012

    #2 for all the reasons mentioned. I would add to easier on wrists and elbows – easier on neck and left shoulder (I am a right handed golfer). I realize this could show a swing flaw but I do not think so. I am 62 and am a 8 handicap (used to be scratch). Old football injuries in neck and shoulder show up on older style mats (hate them) but I can hit 125 balls at a time on your mat with virtually no pain. Great product.

    Reply to this comment
  30. Bill Bigler

    24. Jul, 2012

    #2 for all the reasons mentioned. I would add to easier on wrists and elbows – easier on neck and left shoulder (I am a right handed golfer). I realize this could show a swing flaw but I do not think so. I am 62 and am a 8 handicap (used to be scratch). Old football injuries in neck and shoulder show up on older style mats (hate them) but I can hit 125 balls at a time on your mat with virtually no pain. Great product.

    Reply to this comment
  31. Shereen

    25. Jul, 2012

    I like version 2.

    Reply to this comment
  32. Shereen

    25. Jul, 2012

    I like version 2.

    Reply to this comment

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress Lab